|Title||Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2015|
|Authors||Yu, Fang, Ming-Hui Chen, Lynn Kuo, Heather Talbott, and John S. Davis|
|Date Published||2015 Aug 07|
|Keywords||Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Dinoprost, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Regulatory Networks, Humans, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Signal Transduction, Time Factors|
BACKGROUND: Recently, the Bayesian method becomes more popular for analyzing high dimensional gene expression data as it allows us to borrow information across different genes and provides powerful estimators for evaluating gene expression levels. It is crucial to develop a simple but efficient gene selection algorithm for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes based on the Bayesian estimators.RESULTS: In this paper, by extending the two-criterion idea of Chen et al. (Chen M-H, Ibrahim JG, Chi Y-Y. A new class of mixture models for differential gene expression in DNA microarray data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2008;138:387-404), we propose two new gene selection algorithms for general Bayesian models and name these new methods as the confident difference criterion methods. One is based on the standardized differences between two mean expression values among genes; the other adds the differences between two variances to it. The proposed confident difference criterion methods first evaluate the posterior probability of a gene having different gene expressions between competitive samples and then declare a gene to be DE if the posterior probability is large. The theoretical connection between the proposed first method based on the means and the Bayes factor approach proposed by Yu et al. (Yu F, Chen M-H, Kuo L. Detecting differentially expressed genes using alibrated Bayes factors. Statistica Sinica. 2008;18:783-802) is established under the normal-normal-model with equal variances between two samples. The empirical performance of the proposed methods is examined and compared to those of several existing methods via several simulations. The results from these simulation studies show that the proposed confident difference criterion methods outperform the existing methods when comparing gene expressions across different conditions for both microarray studies and sequence-based high-throughput studies. A real dataset is used to further demonstrate the proposed methodology. In the real data application, the confident difference criterion methods successfully identified more clinically important DE genes than the other methods.CONCLUSION: The confident difference criterion method proposed in this paper provides a new efficient approach for both microarray studies and sequence-based high-throughput studies to identify differentially expressed genes.
|Alternate Journal||BMC Bioinformatics|
|Original Publication||Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.|
|PubMed Central ID||PMC4527130|
|Grant List||P01 CA142538 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States |
R01 GM070335 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
GM 70335 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.