Publications
Filters: Author is Marchenko, Olga [Clear All Filters]
Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"Nine-year change in statistical design, profile, and success rates of Phase II oncology trials." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 141-9.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Comparing oncology clinical programs by use of innovative designs and expected net present value optimization: Which adaptive approach leads to the best result?" J Biopharm Stat 27, no. 3 (2017): 457-476.
"Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology." J Biopharm Stat 26, no. 1 (2016): 150-66.
"